In a few days, America goes to the polls to elect the person who will run the country over the next four years. The choice is between Barack Obama, the incumbent, and Mitt Romney, the Republican challenger.
If the people of Ireland were allowed a vote in the Election, we would vote overwhelmingly for Obama. This has raised a few eyebrows across the pond, but in Ireland it’s pretty clear why this is the case: the modern Republican party has an outlook that is totally alien to most Irish people. It’s an extremist dominated party characterised by a slash-and-burn approach to social welfare, touting an aggressive military policy towards foreign states, all the while attempting to row back decades of progress on womens’ rights, gay rights and worker’s rights and softening the boundaries between church and state.
A case in point: the Republican case for small government and laissez-faire economics calls to mind the Great Famine in Ireland. After successive failures of the potato crop, you would have thought that Britain would have done everything it could to prevent a catastrophe. Instead, they rationalised themselves with mantras such as “let the market decide”, and “God’s providence” to make a bad situation much, much worse. Over a million people died. It was left to charitable organisations such as the Quakers to pick up the pieces.
Having visited America many times, I have always been impressed by the friendly, hard-working nature of its people. It’s a place where friendships are made easily. People are caring, thoughtful and considerate. Normal, in other words. So why are so many people – almost 50% of the population – in thrall to the destructive policies of the American Right Wing?
Anger must play a factor. I remember many years ago, talking to an elderly American couple that I knew well. It was a polite, warm conversation until I mentioned Bill Clinton. The man’s face crumpled up and he quickly launched into a diatribe of how the man was the greatest liar the country had ever seen. If anything, this sentiment has increased, both in scope and intensity. The economy has been doing badly. Government debt is measured in the trillions. Unemployment is at record highs. It seems that everyone is looking for a scapegoat. For many, Obama is that scapegoat.
Coupled with anger is fear: the worry that left to his own devices, Obama will increase taxes on the rich and elderly, socialise the economy and punish small businesses. They worry that he will open the borders to unconstrained immigration from Latin America and make America’s borders defenceless against perceived and real enemies from outside the country. Despite four years in power, where none of these supposed inevitabilities have come to pass, these fears have not abated.
The media must take a large slice of the blame for this climate of fear. A propagandist media, the likes of which does not exist in Europe, dominates the airwaves. Theirs is a message of doom, anger, and dare-I-say-it: hatred. The word “liberal” is spat out with venom from right-wing pundits the length and breath of the country.
All one can hope for is that the demographics in the US are slowly changing. The country is transitioning from a WASP dominated culture to a more diverse, internationalised one. The Internet gives people more links to the outside world and younger people are itching to rid themselves of the Generation X and Y burdens.
The USA is a wonderful country, and one I’m in thrall to. Its ethics of hard work, freedom of speech and opportunity are ones worth aspiring to. Hopefully one day we can look back on this time and reflect on the damage that ideology can do.
“Having visited America many times, I have always been impressed by the friendly, hard-working nature of its people. Itβs a place where friendships are made easily. People are caring, thoughtful and considerate. Normal, in other words. So why are so many people β almost 50% of the population β in thrall to the destructive policies of the American Right Wing?
Anger must play a factor.”
Wow Colm. Anger must play a factor? “Destructive policies”? You have been here so many times – and still you don’t get it, what this country and people are all about.
You know why we have this deadlock in USA? Because of people just like you – so convinced that they have patent on wisdom, and that they are so unquestionably right. You’re perfect representative of what is wrong with the World these days, and why compromises are nowadays so hard to come by, sorry to say.
And no – I did not vote for Romney this time. And I still like you π
Joe, I sincerely hope I never come across that I have a patent on anything, as I am not wise and I do not believe I am unquestionably right. I am, like everyone else, conditioned by my upbringing and the values I have been brought up with. If I come across as liberal to you, well – that’s the way I see things, I guess. It may not be perfect, but it’s based on values and attitudes that I have and hold dear.
I wrote this article because I have been troubled by the huge levels of discord in the US, not because I felt that I was unquestionably right. It’s been an attempt to set forth my views, and to have them challenged, as maybe I’ll learn something new along the way.
You didn’t vote Romney? Too left wing for you? π
I didn’t vote for Romney even though I agree with some positions that he holds, but I agree with some positions that Barack holds more. Let’s say that I reached compromise with myself. Liberal, conservative – I really don’t care about these labels anymore because they are nothing more that an attempt to box you into preset template of partisan dogma, one way or the other
But apparently you do, more so then when we met last time. Be honest – when was it last time when you recognized that you are wrong, and admitted it freely? That’s why I decided to reply to this article in your blog, after some internal struggle. Anyway.
We would have to talk some more over Pilsner Urquell to get somewhere π
Hope you’re well.
Recognised I was wrong? Where do I start? π
Most of the time, in my contacts and relations with other people, it’s all a damned blur – I think I’m doing the right thing and yet the outcome is 180 degrees the other way. But I try in these circumstances to understand where the other person is coming from, and not to assume that only my way of thinking is right. It doesn’t always work, either. Currently feeling remorseful about something I said to a person close to me that caused that person a lot of anguish. And also feeling a bit of an idiot in terms of assessments I made about the whole situation – assessments that proved absolutely incorrect.
Also the number of posts I have here that I never published, because I felt I was missing something. I have a post written not so long ago that I trimmed up, ready to send, but never published – as I felt, and still feel, that it only reflects one particular set of circumstances. Even though it seemed right as it applied to me, another part of me saw it as complete bullshit. Just one of many unpublished posts that nobody will ever read.
I got it badly wrong with some of the leaders of our little country some time back – thought they were doing a great job. Still agonise whether the current crowd are doing the best for the country, or we’re going to be sold (further) down the Swanee.
My Twitter stream is similarly peppered with hasty judgements, often made in the heat of a situation, and not having considered the full situation. (Mind you, I’m not alone in this! A natural consequence of the medium, I think.)
It’s a damned struggle to see things from another person’s viewpoint, and it’s often so much easier to shortcut to the easiest and effortless answer. In the long run, it’s much better to do the hard work, and believe me, it’s still a lesson I’m learning.
Colm,
Your original post was a lot more right than wrong. Not all opinions are equally correct or even equally plausible. It is wrong to think that one opinion or viewpoint is as good as the next, in fact it’s irresponsible and dangerous.
While it is true that all people are created equal, that stops being the case the moment after conception. The same is true for of opinions. We need to recall that 50% of all Americans have IQs of less than 100 and that very few have 30 to 60 hours of graduate level economics to help them think clearly about economics and political choices.
Even fewer Americans have meaningful combat experience, but this does not prevent them having the opinions about voting for a draft dodgers like Romney, Clinton or Bush the Younger to run run our military juggernaut and decide who to attack and bully.
You shouldn’t apologize for clarity of observation, thinking and expression. The more of that, the better.
Phred
Yes, there is lots of Irish in USA, if that’s what you’re trying to say π
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others.
-Douglas Adams
Who was it who said “You are entitled to your opinion, but not to your facts”?
Probably Winston Churchill. It’s always Winston Churchill.
Patrick Moynihan (1994), Jame Sclesinger (1973) and Bernard Baruch (1950) all said it in slightly different ways.
Ah. Thought it might be a witty retort to Lady Astor.
In the morning I will be sober?
Not if I were your husband.